Credit Today is the fastest growing publication in the credit field, favored by more and more top credit executives. We cover the world of business, or trade credit, with concise, yet in-depth, reporting. We also publish the most in-depth salary survey in the industry, covering all major credit positions.   
Home     Credit Jobs!     Search     Help     Resource Directory     Tell a Friend     Contact     Subscriber Area
 Join Us
We invite you to join the private subscribers-only Credit Today community and discussion area. Click here to learn more.
 Departments
Webinars
Bankruptcy Issues
Benchmark Central
Best Practices
Checklists
Collections Today
Credit Cards
Credit Dept Profiles
Credit Mgmt Today
Credit Mgr's Letter
Credit Scoring
Deductions Today
Downloads
Dr. Credit
Financial Analysis
Forum Archives
Fraud
Glossary of Terms
HR Issues Today
International
Legal Issues
ListServ Signup
Resale Certificates
Resource Directory
Subscriber Tools
Technology Today
Tip of the Week
Unclaimed Property
Vendor Articles
Press Releases
 Special Reports
Tech Buyer's Guide
Staff Benchmarking
Salary Survey
Book Store
Credit Stats
 About Credit Today
Mission Statement
Member Benefits
Sample Articles
Testimonials
Help
Submissions
Tell a Friend
Our Staff
Editorial Advisors
Consumer Credit Page
Contact
 Subscription Activation
If you are a current subscriber to the print edition of Credit Today, and have your subscriber ID number, click here to activate your Free subscription to CreditToday Online.
 Sponsors
Kreller Group

===============

Our Subscribers Say...

Credit Today's Resource Directory and their online e-mail forum (ListServ) provide information on almost any credit-related topic you can think of. It is a great way to exchange information with other credit professionals. As the saying goes, "You don't know what you don't know."
- Scott Goen, Credit Manager, Big Lots Stores, Inc., Wholesale Division

"We've recently started using the ListServ tool within Credit Today. This is phenomenal and powerful forum for gaining immediate feedback, ideas, and suggestions, relative to any credit topic under the sun, all in a real-time e-mail format."
-Javier Vela, Senior Credit Manager, Global Credit Services, JDA Software Group Inc.

"Being a part of the Credit Today online community is like having the expertise of hundreds of credit managers at your fingertips. These credit execs are willing to help you solve topical business issues as they arise. In the current environment of ever increasing competing priorities which reduce our opportunities to meet peers out of the office face-to-face, this is the most valuable tool you can have on your desktop! It's important that we have a mechanism to reach out to our counterparts quickly to exchange knowledge as well as to stay on top of industry trends."
- Victoria Artis, Director of Customer Financial Services, Pfizer, Inc.

"Over the last 10 years I've seen Credit Today evolve from a monthly credit publication into a quality source of information and guidance for the B2B credit community. The website, with its user friendly form downloads, will take you from examples of new account credit applications to bankruptcy forms and everything in between.

The Credit Today ListServ has become the pre-imminent online forum, providing an opportunity for discussion and comments (and occasional humor) from an impressive list of credit professionals."
David Dungan, Director of Credit
Justin Brands, Inc. (A Berkshire Hathaway company)
Fort Worth, Texas

"There are numerous credit periodicals available to the credit professional today. How good is Credit Today? Is it relevant? I always have to read it late, or online because my credit analysts want to read it the minute it comes in. When my staff wants to read a publication before I have a chance to read it then something is working in that publication. We have cancelled our other subscriptions. When you have the best you do not need the rest."
Ron Woods
Corporate Credit Manager-World Wide
Thales Navigation, Inc.

"The newsletter, coupled with the website and the ListServ, are to us, more valuable than any other credit publication, bar none. I try to use at least one article out of each newsletter for departmental training/discussion sessions."
D. Mark Constantine
Corporate Credit Mgr
Fulton Paper Company

"I love Credit Today and read every issue cover to cover. For me, the greatest perk of a subscription is ListServ. I believe Credit Today's ListServ members may be the most knowledgeable Credit brain trust in existence today. I have saved and categorized hundreds of contributions on a wide variety of topics which I refer to often. It's an easy and cost effective way to network and learn."
Doug M. Thomas
Kimberly-Clark Customer Financial Services

Home | Sample Articles | Benchmarking Collection Agencies: Tips for Ma . . . Search 
Experian IQ
Benchmarking Collection Agencies: Tips for Maximizing Your Relationship With Your Collection Agency

Printer-Friendly Format

This month's mini-benchmarking survey by Credit Today investigated collection agency usage. We had 89 participants from a wide range of industries and company types. Nine out of ten respondents place claims with third-party collection agencies as a regular part of their recovery efforts.

Credit Pros Show Great Loyalty to Their Agencies
Since the client/agency relationship is held in high regard by many credit pros, it is not surprising that most participants reported a limited number of agency relationships. Over 70 percent of our respondents use only one or two agencies (the split is almost even between one and two). Less than 10 percent use more than three agencies and those tended to be larger enterprises with a sizeable customer base or multiple locations.

  

Moreover, 94 percent indicated they had no intention of changing agencies within the next year, which is not surprising since the average tenure for our participants' primary agency is 10.5 years. The average length of the relationship for all agencies was not far behind at 8.9 years. However, 61 percent will also send claims directly to an attorney. Comments by a number of respondents indicated that they prefer to send their largest claims directly to an attorney.

  

Another reason for sticking with just one or two agencies is if you do not place many claims. Nearly two-thirds of our survey participants placed, on average, two or fewer claims each month. Another 17 percent place three to five claims per month, but only six percent file more than ten claims in any given month.

Broken promises and the failure to return calls are the most common events that trigger a collection claim. Past-due balances, disconnected phones and bounced checks round out the top five. The average dollar value of claims placed ranged from under $100 to $25,000. The median claim size was $4,500 ($1,500 for the 1st Quartile and $7,000 for the 3rd Quartile). When it comes to filing a law suit, the median is $5,000 for the minimum amount that will be considered for legal action ($1,500 for the 1st Quartile and $10,000 for the 3rd Quartile).

  

Contingency Rates Related to Claim Size
The contingency rates that collection agencies charged our sample ranged from 3 percent to 50 percent, but as expected showed a definite downward trend as the claim size increased. Not surprisingly there were also indications that, as one's volume of claims with a particular agency increases, better contingency rates may be negotiable - another reason to limit the number of agencies you utilize. The chart below provides an overview of the range in contingency rates that our participants reported paying, based on specified claim amounts. You should note that we found no significant variance in the contingency rates for claims in the $500 to $5,000 range.

  

While the contingency rate charged is a factor in assessing agency performance, the percentage of claims collected within a specified time can be an even more important factor. An agency with a higher contingency rate can still deliver a greater net return if the percentage of claims they recover is higher than that of a low-fee agency. Recoveries net of contingency fees and other collection expenses is the benchmark of agency performance. We found that on average, 47 percent of claims placed by our participants are collected within one year.

There are of course other factors that affect agency performance. A number of our respondents pointed out the percent of claims collected in-house by the agency as opposed to being forwarded to an attorney can have a significant impact on agency performance.

Attornies Cost More
Claims forwarded to an attorney typically incur additional fees, have higher contingency rates, and take longer to collect than claims settled by the agency. A good agency will also be able to negotiate better contingency rates with their attorney network and monitor claims being handled by attorneys to try to avoid potential delays in the recovery process.

Selecting a New Agency: What's Most Important?
When selecting a new agency, our survey participants closely ranked reputation, recommendations and rates as their top criteria. Relationships followed closely behind, but only placed fourth because, though it got the second highest number of first place votes, it also tied for the second highest number of 5th place votes. References were only considered marginally important and size ranked last, not even garnering any 1st or 2nd place votes.

  

There were other factors that survey participants found important for evaluating collection agency performance.

  • Ability to handle special needs
  • Availability of advice on a wide range of collection and recovery topics
  • Commitment to the collection of the balance regardless of the size
  • Effective communications in regard to claims and status
  • Online access to account status
  • Personal service
  • Professionalism
  • Responsiveness
  • Time it takes to collect claims (recovery cycle)
  • Treatment of customers
  • Willingness to negotiate rates on larger placements

These factors, of course, will either directly or indirectly affect net recoveries. Even so, they are sometimes hard to quantify when comparing different agencies.

One participant solved that problem by using an internally prepared scorecard to rate their agencies. This has the advantage of providing a common standard for comparisons as well as, over time, providing trend information regarding an individual agency's performance.

Another innovative approach to agency performance measurement comes from Dale Gerschutz, who is with Haldex Credit Service Corporation. He recommends that measurement be "based on the percentage of collections against the number of days placed; a sort of DSO calculation based on collection of accounts placed for collection."

  
Measuring agency performance can be difficult, especially if you do not place many claims. That is because results on individual placements can vary greatly. Nonetheless, it is clearly essential that agency performance be regularly monitored. The information detailed in this survey will provide you with the necessary benchmarks to ensure you are getting maximum value from your agency relationships.


Printer-Friendly Format
·  Collection Law Firms Growing Fast
·  The Best Ways to Track Performance of Collectors
·  Questions to Ask a Prospective Collection Agency
·  Benchmarking Today: Number of Accounts Assigned to Collectors
·  Pricing Pressure on Collection Agencies, Says Collection Expert
·  Simple Checklist for Developing a Collection Strategy


Experian IQ