This major apparel maker chalked up its best record ever for days sales outstanding last year while increasing sales by 12% and reducing credit staff by 35%. How was this possible? The credit chief attributes much of the achievement to a network of smoothly functioning teams.

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the Credit & Collection Manager's Letter, which Credit Today purchased in 2006. This article was a Forum column.

Before the credit department takes any adverse action (e.g., a credit hold) against any important customer of Oshkosh B'Gosh Inc. (Oshkosh, Wisconsin), a four-member team meets to discuss the problem and vote on a recommendation. The team consists of the corporate credit director, the vice president of Sales, and the regional sales and credit or accounts receivables managers in the region where the customer is located. Team rules require that three of the four must agree for an action to be approved.

"To date, we've convened the team twice," says Credit Director Lee Teigen, CCE. "In both cases, the decisions were unanimous."

This interdepartmental team, formed to iron out issues that might arise between Credit and Sales, is just one of many--interdepartmental, intradepartmental, and multidepartmental--established since the company began moving toward a more team-based environment in the early 1990s. What has resulted is a network of teams at various levels and encompassing a number of different departments. Teigen discusses the implications of the team-based organization for the credit department.

Intradepartmental Teams
In early 1994, the credit department reorganized into three different teams:

• A transportation team (a function for which Teigen also previously had responsibility).
• Two credit teams (divided up by customer), each with six members. "Each team takes care of the total process for which we have responsibility," explains Teigen. This includes credit decision-making, cash application, return authorizations, deductions, credit memos, collections, and write-offs.

The team has nine members:

• director of Corporate Credit (Teigen), who is also the team leader
• vice president of Sales
• director of Information Service
• director of Customer Service
• Advertising manager
• Corporate Transportation manager
• Accounts Receivable manager
• HR Training manager
• a distribution center manager

All team members were selected on the basis of their involvement in the customer deduction process and the need for their support and assistance. In researching the source of the problem, the team targeted two areas for improvement:

1. Communicate better with the sales force. "We came up with better ways to report deduction information to salespeople," he says. "We also developed a form for sales managers to use when evaluating their salespeople related to deduction performance."
2. Train the salespeople better. "We provided salespeople with better training on how to handle deduction information when communicating with customers."

"Customers are now much happier that deductions are being resolved faster," he continues. "The improvement has also reduced the amount of travel that we must do to meet with customers to resolve deductions."

Editor's Note: The above article originally appeared in the Credit & Collection Manager's Letter, a newsletter purchased by Credit Today in 2006. This article originally appeared prior to 2000.

Related Articles

·  Networking for Effective Credit Management and Sales Relations ·  Teaming Up With Sales For Collections ·  Vendor Case Study: How Henkel Improved Operational Efficiency Around the Order-to-Cash Cycle Within its Shared Service Operation ·  A Credit Staff Selection and Training Success Model ·  Productivity Opportunity Checklist - How Productive Are You? Where Should You Improve? ·  Is Your Credit Staff All on the Same Team? ·  Six Bunker Busting Tips for Improving Internal Communications ·  Want to Make a Quantum Leap in Productivity? Here Are Five Pitfalls to Avoid ·  Harvard Business Review: What Great Managers DO