 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Our Subscribers Say...
I think Credit Today is fantastic. You cover many practical topics in the credit field that I use regularly. Just one recent example—a conversation on the ListServ about preferential payments—gave me tips that I used in an actual case. The specific information I picked up from this one discussion saved me $10,000, enough to cover my membership for many years!
- Steve Savino
Manager of Credit & Collections, ASSA Abloy Americas Division, New Haven, CT
Credit Today's Resource Directory and their online e-mail forum (ListServ) provide information on almost any credit-related topic you can think of. It is a great way to exchange information with other credit professionals. As the saying goes, "You don't know what you don't know."
- Scott Goen,
Credit Manager, Big Lots Stores, Inc., Wholesale Division
"We've recently started using the ListServ tool within Credit Today. This is phenomenal and powerful forum for gaining immediate feedback, ideas, and suggestions, relative to any credit topic under the sun, all in a real-time e-mail format."
-Javier Vela, Senior Credit Manager, Global Credit Services, JDA Software Group Inc.
"Being a part of the Credit Today online community is like having the expertise of hundreds of credit managers at your fingertips. These credit execs are willing to help you solve topical business issues as they arise. In the current environment of ever increasing competing priorities which reduce our opportunities to meet peers out of the office face-to-face, this is the most valuable tool you can have on your desktop! It's important that we have a mechanism to reach out to our counterparts quickly to exchange knowledge as well as to stay on top of industry trends."
- Victoria Artis, Director of Customer Financial Services, Pfizer, Inc.
"Over the last 10 years I've seen Credit Today evolve from a monthly credit publication into a quality source of information and guidance for the B2B credit community. The website, with its user friendly form downloads, will take you from examples of new account credit applications to bankruptcy forms and everything in between.
The Credit Today ListServ has become the pre-imminent online forum, providing an opportunity for discussion and comments (and occasional humor) from an impressive list of credit professionals."
David Dungan, Director of Credit
Justin Brands, Inc. (A Berkshire Hathaway company)
Fort Worth, Texas
"There are numerous credit periodicals available to the credit professional today. How good is Credit Today? Is it relevant? I always have to read it late, or online because my credit analysts want to read it the minute it comes in. When my staff wants to read a publication before I have a chance to read it then something is working in that publication. We have cancelled our other subscriptions. When you have the best you do not need the rest."
Ron Woods
Corporate Credit Manager-World Wide
Thales Navigation, Inc.
"The newsletter, coupled with the website and the ListServ, are to us, more valuable than any other credit publication, bar none. I try to use at least one article out of each newsletter for departmental training/discussion sessions."
D. Mark Constantine
Corporate Credit Mgr
Fulton Paper Company
"I love Credit Today and read every issue cover to cover. For me, the greatest perk of a subscription is ListServ. I believe Credit Today's ListServ members may be the most knowledgeable Credit brain trust in existence today. I have saved and categorized hundreds of contributions on a wide variety of topics which I refer to often. It's an easy and cost effective way to network and learn."
Doug M. Thomas
Kimberly-Clark Customer Financial Services |
|
|
 |
Answer and Analysis
Mabel lost. The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington affirmed and awarded attorney fees and expenses to the second mortgagee. The court stated that an accord is a contract between a debtor and a creditor to settle a claim by some performance other than that which is due. There must be a meeting of the minds, consideration, and an intention of the parties to satisfy the claim. The court held that there could be no accord in this particular case, because the purchaser at the foreclosure sale was not the debtor.
Legal Issues in Credit
An unsurpassed resource to help credit execs with complex legal issues. We translate often obscure legal language into terms that shed light instead of shadow. Here's what you need to know about liens, contracts, personal and corporate guarantees, UCC issues, security interests, PMSIs, battles of forms, managing lawsuits, antitrust issues and much more!
Check out Credit Today's
Credit Today's Legal Issues Portal
|
The court pointed out that this particular purchaser at the foreclosure sale was not the debtor, owed no obligation to the mortgagee, and was only making an offer to the mortgagee. As to the retention of the check for more than 10 days, the court relied on the fact that the State of Washington courts require some affirmative manifestation of a creditor's acceptance of an offer, such as cashing a check. Retention of the check was usually considered insufficient, and furthermore, there was no consideration for the alleged accord. The court pointed out that the bank held the check for only an additional six days which was not significant.
If the bank held the check for an additional 10 or 20 days or even 30 days, it is quite possible that the decision of the court might have been otherwise. Other verbal conversations or other actions by the bank and Mabel might also have led a court to believe that there was an acceptance of the check. The mere fact of retaining the check beyond the time specified in the offer might remove the bank's option of whether to accept or reject the check in other states.
The moral is that if a check is offered with this kind of condition attached, you should return it immediately rather than sitting on it pending some kind of decision. Often checks are submitted as paying the debt in full, which presents different problems. But any check that comes with a separate letter or notations on the check itself must receive attention.
If the debtor is setting conditions or specific terms under which the check is being offered, the creditor should review the terms and conditions carefully and reasonably quickly to see if they are acceptable. If not acceptable, a decision must be made whether to return the check. The accord and satisfaction statutes of the particular state also should be reviewed.
Editor's Note: The above article originally appeared in the Credit & Collection Manager's Letter, a newsletter purchased by Credit Today in 2006. This article originally appeared prior to 2000.
<< Previous
| |
|
 |
Credit Groups 2012
Wonder What the ROI is on Credit Groups?
Find out here...
It's been 4 years since our original ground-breaking survey on credit groups and we're revisiting this most important topic. Among other topics, we're investigating:
- What are the top services being offered by credit groups
- How much credit groups cost
- What the value of credit group services is
- What the value of credit group services is in comparison to credit reporting services
- How data is submitted
- What percentage of credit groups reveal terms
- What percentage of credit groups share data outside the credit group
And much more...
Click here to participate!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
May 2012
|
|
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webinars